Friday, July 23, 2010

Time Travel theory - in English

A theory about how time travel would be possible and how would it work

Most likely you have heard of the "grandfather paradox" :

If you travel back in time, to kill ur grandfather, ether always somethign happens that

wont let you or wold make it impossible to timetravel. When ya kill ur grandfather, u

would never be born and you couldn't have gone back in time to do that in the first

place.


What if Time exists and it is possible to travel within it to the past?

Lets say we have a timemachine that is capable to travel in time and i decide to go 10

years back, to give myself the results of a big lottery.


Time itself could be represented as a long line - a Timeline that gets longer and longer

as time passes by. If i sit in my machine and travel back, i will be separated from this

Timeline and actually create a new one:

------------------------------I-----------A

I-----------B

A is the one i was in and B is the new one and I marks the spot of departure and entry.

New timeline will continue to get longer. It is possible that after i leave this timeline, it

simply stops since there is absolutely nothing in it to create new events.

Timelines itself don't have to be parallel to each other, evolve at the same speed or

even contain same events. I can choose any point in any timeline to jump to.

However, starting from the moment i reenter the selected timeline A, i create a new

branch/line due to the mere presence alters this timeline (a disruption in air currents, a

mere sight of me etc etc):
----------------------IA2

----------------------I------------------A

The new branch is a alternative version of the time i entered, with new future events

starting from this point. Its like the timeline i created when exiting my origin location,

instead its filled with the event from the original Timeline up until the point i entered.

It would render the Grandfather paradox completely useless since i was born in a

different timeline - nether could anyone else disrupt that - they would just create a

alternative version as well.

Reconnecting with my origin Timeline would be impossible - any knowledge etc makes

me different so the point of reentry would create a new alternate version.

Also Timelines progress at a different speed making traveling to the future only half

possible - you cannot travel to something that haven't yet happened, only to a spot

that you perceive as a future - since you were in a slower timeline, you can enter

another one that progressed faster and move in to the "future", while in reality it would

simply be a already happened history in timeline.

Theory gives a sneak-peek of the fact that every decision, move, subatomic event

has infinite number of possible outcomes - i could or could have not wrote this blog,

write a different letter somewhere or different font etc. Each of those could trigger a

new possible timeline each being slightly different version.

Dividign with zero - a theory, in English

Presumably it is so that if anyone would divide 0 with two it would mean the end of
the world or the end of everything.

In the evening i suddenly got the idea.

Currently its widely spread and known that zero means its completely nothing,
emptiness.

But what if the zero, in fact, is everything?

When dividing  with two,  you get two halves:

10 : 2 = 5 and 5

Just like when you cut an apple in two and get two halves, not one (10 / 2 = 5).

So if we divide a zero, we get two sides as well:

0 : 2 = ∞ and - ∞

(∞ meaning infinity )

At the same time both sides must be equal.

from 0 to ∞ = from  -∞ to 0.

Lets say, for example, we choose  the sides value to be 5:

0 : 2 = 5 and -5

Adding two sides together  we get 0.

Similar rule applies to all even numbers (4, 6, 8, 10, 12 ...)

However The number of  answers increases accordingly, while there must be equal

amount of positive and negative  numbers.

For future reference  ill replace  ∞ with n.

example: 0 : 4  = n & -n & n & -n

In short 0 : 4 = 2n & -2n

Lets give n a value of 5:

0 : 4 = 5 & -5 & 5 & -5

0 : 4 = 10 & -10

So n value is half  the value of the divider.

0 : 6 = 3n & -3n

0 : 8 = 4n & -4n

Dividing 0 with a odd number is slightly different (using z1 and z2  to represent two

sides).

0 : 3 = z1 + z2

z1 = n & -n & n

z2 = -n & n & -n


z1 = 2n & -n

z2 = n & -2n


0 : 3 =  3n & .3n

0 : 3 = n & -n

PS! Dividing 0 with 1 would  give 0 since  you cannot divide a whole into 1 piece

and get  two pieces.
0 : 1 = 0


For bigger odd numbers ( 5, 7 , 9, 11 ...)

0 : 5 = z1 + z2



z1 = n & -n & n & -n & n

z2 = -n & n & -n & n & -n



z1 = 3n & -2n

z2 = 2n & -3n


0 : 5 = 5n & -5n

0 :5 = n & -n

So the end result is always n & -n.

In summary we can create two formulas:
    x means divider, n the value of the answer.

Even:

 0 : x = (x : 2)n & -(x : 2)n

Odd:

0 : x = n & -n


I apologize for any mathematically incorrect calculations. This does not however

include the "you cannot divide zero" fact. Theories are theories, just like we used to

believe that earth is flat and sun orbits around earth until proven otherwise, even while
majority believed it is completely wrong and not plausible.